.Google's Martin Splitt responded to an inquiry in the search engine optimisation Office Hrs podcast about whether reproducing YouTube video recording material into content on a websites would certainly be actually viewed as duplicate material and possess a negative influence on the websites positions.Although replicate information is actually not an adverse ranking factor, material released on an extra reliable web site can induce the material on the a lot less authoritative internet site to become outed perform. It is actually a valid inquiry to inquire because information on an authoritative is going to out perform the very same information on a much less authoritative one.Some in the hunt community pertain to one piece of web content laying hold of the rankings of one more as 'cannibalization' of the web page's ranking possibility. This is actually the issue of the person asking the inquiry.Google.com's Martin Splitt told the sent inquiry:." If I create a YouTube online video and then take that exact message or material and also place it on a website page, could Google flag that websites or even site for duplicate content?".Different Material Media Are Actually Addressed As Separate.Martin Splitt addressed that the 2 forms of web content are actually different as well as are going to certainly not be handled as the exact same web content, thus publishing text message content removed coming from a video recording is going to not be looked at duplicate material.This is his solution:." Zero, one is a video and also the various other one is message web content, and that would certainly be one-of-a-kind web content!".Publishing Removed Text Coming From Online Video.Martin praised the suggestion of removing text message material coming from an online video and republishing it as text message, noting that some individuals choose to consume material in text form rather than viewing a video clip. Reversing the circulation of material coming from text to sound or video clip is actually perhaps certainly not a negative concept also since some people have issue reading text content as well as may favor listening to it coming from a video recording or a podcast layout.Martin discussed publishing online video material in a textual model:." It is actually also not a poor concept, some individuals (like me) may prefer a message version as well as others might certainly not be able to utilize an online video variation of the content from the beginning because of transmission capacity or visual constraints.".Takeaways.The concept responsible for the question is actually repurposing material and also it's an excellent idea. Search is much more than Google.com, it is actually also YouTube as well as any place folks acquire their audio web content, like Spotify. The fact that there is actually no cannibalization of the web content between tools produces repurposing a worthwhile strategy to stretching your web content scope.Listen closely to the podcast at the 8:20 min score:.Featured Image by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.